Aboriginal Antecedents and Contemporary Practices of Restorative Justice: Canada and United States Comparisons

Authors

  • Larry French Justiceworks Institute University of New Hampshire

Abstract

Canada and United States share the same American Indian and Inuit/Alaska Natives groups with many native groups cut off by the artificial border separating not only Canada and the United States but Mexico and the U.S. as well.  In pre-Columbian times these peoples moved freely across these artificial borders that later demarcating the United States from both and Canada (formerly British North America) and Mexico (Spanish America). This work focuses on the U.S./Canadian divide. The First Nations subscribed to a harmonious lifestyle where the restoration of balance was the basis for justice.  The Euro-American sense of adversarial justice was a foreign concept forced upon them.  In the 1980s attempts were made in both Canada and the United States to implement some semblance of restorative justice among the recognized tribes.  In Canada, the foundation of these programs emerged from the sentencing circles while in the Unites States peacemaker courts reemerged among their largest tribe – the Navajo (Dine).  This article looks at these programs including their similarities and differences – important factors for American Indians caught up in cross-border judicial issues.

References

Ball, J., W. Caldwell, & K. Pranis. (2010). Doing Democracy with Circles: Engaging Communities in Public Planning. St. Paul, MN: Living Justice Press.

Chartrand, L., McKay, C. (2006). A Review of Research on Criminal Victimization and First Nations, Métis and Inuit Peoples 1990 to 2001. Policy Centre for Victim Issues: Research and Statistics Division.

Criminal Jurisdiction over Indians. 105 U.S. Statutes at Large 646, 25 U.S.c. 1301 (4) 1991.

Death Penalty in the U.S. (1976-2008). Clark County Prosecuting Attorney: http://www.clarkprosecutor.org/html/death/dpusa.htm

Department of Justice - Canada (2002-12). Youth Criminal Justice Act: S.C. 2002, c1.

Ex Parte Crow Dog. Supreme Court of the United States, 1883, 109 U.S. 556, 3 S.Ct. 396.

French, L.A. (1994). Foundations of Indian Justice (Part I) The Winds of Injustice: American Indians and the U.S. Government. New York, NY: Garland Publishing, Inc.: 3-74.

French, L.A. (1997). Indians and Substance Abuse: The Major Clinical Issue. Counseling American Indian. Lanham, MD: University Press of America: 1-26.

French, L.A. (2000). The Nature of Substance Abuse among Native Americans. Addictions and Native Americans. Westport, CT: Praeger: 35-44.

French, L.A. (2003a) The Cherokee Example of the Harmony Ethos. Native American Justice. Chicago, IL: Burham: 85-96.

French (2003b). Standing Bear decision; Crow Dog and the Major Crimes Act. Native American Justice. Chicago, IL: Burham: 13; 133-137.

French, L.A. (2003). Indian Courts and Jurisdictions (Cpt. 5); The Navajo Court System (Cpt. 7) Native American Justice. Chicago, IL: Burnham: 127-140; 149-174..

French, L.A. (2006). Navajo (Dine) Justice: Blending the Past with the Present, Restorative Directions Journal, vol. 2 (2a): 219-235.

French, L.A. (2007a). Native American Aboriginal Cooperative Worldview. Legislating Indian Country: Significant Milestones in Transforming Tribalism. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing: 3-15.

French, L.A. (2007b). Jurisprudence and Cultural Genocide: Outlawing Traditionalism. Legislating Indian Country: Significant Milestones Transforming Tribalism. New York, NY: Peter Lang: 65-82.

French, L.A., & Manzanarez, M. (2004). Comparative Criminal & Human Justice (Part III) NAFTA & Neocolonialism: Comparative Criminal, Human & Social Justice. Lanham, MD: University Press of America: 119-132.

Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 237-241 (1976).

Gladue Principle (R. v. Gladue (1999) 1 S.C.R. 688).

Jones, A. (2012). Court rules against extraditing aboriginal defendants to U.S., The Globe and Mail (British Columbia), (September 22): pg A14.

Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262, 96 S. Ct. 2950 (1976).

Indian Crimes Act of 1976. U.S. Statutes at Large. 90:585-86, May 29, 1976.

Major Crimes Act. U.S. Statutes at Large, 23L: 385 (18 U.S.C.: 1153, 1885).

Paul, D.N. (2006).Twentieth-Century Racism and Centralization. First Nation History: We Were Not the Savages. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood Publishing: 281.-319.

Proffit v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242, 252 (1976).

Ross, R. (2006). Returning to the Teachings: Exploring Aboriginal Justice. Toronto, Canada: Penguin Group-Canada.

Terrill, R.J. (2003). Canada (Chapter II) World Criminal Justice Systems. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company: 115-197.

U.S. v. Kagama. Hall.118U.S. 375, 382-85 (May 10, 1886).

Winterdyk, J.A. (2006). Canadian Criminology (Second Edition). Toronto, Canada: Pearson/Prentice

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles